Who built the ISS? International Space Station

One of humanity's greatest assets is the International Space Station, or ISS. Several states united to create it and operate it in orbit: Russia, some European countries, Canada, Japan and the USA. This apparatus shows that much can be achieved if countries constantly cooperate. Everyone on the planet knows about this station and many people ask questions about at what altitude the ISS flies and in what orbit. How many astronauts have been there? Is it true that tourists are allowed there? And this is not all that is interesting to humanity.

Station structure

The ISS consists of fourteen modules, which house laboratories, warehouses, rest rooms, bedrooms, and utility rooms. The station even has a gym with exercise equipment. This entire complex runs on solar panels. They are huge, the size of a stadium.

Facts about the ISS

During its operation, the station aroused a lot of admiration. This apparatus is the greatest achievement of human minds. By its design, purpose and features, it can be called perfection. Of course, maybe in 100 years they will start building spaceships of a different type on Earth, but for now, today, this device is the property of humanity. This is evidenced by the following facts about the ISS:

1. During its existence, about two hundred astronauts visited the ISS. There were also tourists here who simply came to look at the Universe from orbital heights.
2. The station is visible from Earth with the naked eye. This structure is the largest among artificial satellites and can be easily seen from the surface of the planet without any magnifying device. There are maps on which you can see what time and when the device flies over cities. Using them you can easily find information about your locality: see the flight schedule over the region.
3. To assemble the station and maintain it in working order, the astronauts went into outer space more than 150 times, spending about a thousand hours there.
4. The device is controlled by six astronauts. The life support system ensures the continuous presence of people at the station from the moment it was first launched.
5. The International Space Station is a unique place where a wide variety of laboratory experiments are conducted. Scientists make unique discoveries in the fields of medicine, biology, chemistry and physics, physiology and meteorological observations, as well as in other fields of science.
6. The device uses giant solar panels the size of a football field with its end zones. Their weight is almost three hundred thousand kilograms.
7. The batteries are capable of fully ensuring the operation of the station. Their work is carefully monitored.
8. The station has a mini-house equipped with two bathrooms and a gym.
9. The flight is monitored from Earth. Programs consisting of millions of lines of code have been developed for control.

Astronauts

Since December 2017, the ISS crew consists of the following astronomers and cosmonauts:

• Anton Shkaplerov - commander of ISS-55. He visited the station twice - in 2011-2012 and in 2014-2015. During 2 flights he lived at the station for 364 days.
• Skeet Tingle - flight engineer, NASA astronaut. This astronaut has no space flight experience.
• Norishige Kanai - flight engineer, Japanese astronaut.
• Alexander Misurkin. Its first flight was made in 2013, lasting 166 days.
• Macr Vande Hai has no flying experience.
• Joseph Akaba. The first flight was made in 2009 as part of Discovery, and the second flight was carried out in 2012.

Earth from space

There are unique views of Earth from space. This is evidenced by photographs and videos of astronauts and cosmonauts. You can see the work of the station and space landscapes if you watch online broadcasts from the ISS station. However, some cameras are turned off due to technical work.

International Space Station

International Space Station, abbr. (English) International Space Station, abbr. ISS) - manned, used as a multi-purpose space research complex. The ISS is a joint international project in which 14 countries participate (in alphabetical order): Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, Russia, USA, France, Switzerland, Sweden, Japan. The original participants included Brazil and the UK.

The ISS is controlled by the Russian segment from the Space Flight Control Center in Korolev, and by the American segment from the Lyndon Johnson Mission Control Center in Houston. The control of the laboratory modules - the European Columbus and the Japanese Kibo - is controlled by the Control Centers of the European Space Agency (Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Tsukuba, Japan). There is a constant exchange of information between the Centers.

History of creation

In 1984, US President Ronald Reagan announced the start of work on the creation of an American orbital station. In 1988, the projected station was named “Freedom”. At the time, it was a joint project between the United States, ESA, Canada and Japan. A large-sized controlled station was planned, the modules of which would be delivered one by one into the Space Shuttle orbit. But by the beginning of the 1990s, it became clear that the cost of developing the project was too high and only international cooperation would make it possible to create such a station. The USSR, which already had experience in creating and launching into orbit the Salyut orbital stations, as well as the Mir station, planned to create the Mir-2 station in the early 1990s, but due to economic difficulties the project was suspended.

On June 17, 1992, Russia and the United States entered into an agreement on cooperation in space exploration. In accordance with it, the Russian Space Agency (RSA) and NASA developed a joint Mir-Shuttle program. This program provided for flights of American reusable space shuttles to the Russian space station Mir, the inclusion of Russian cosmonauts in the crews of American shuttles and American astronauts in the crews of the Soyuz spacecraft and the Mir station.

During the implementation of the Mir-Shuttle program, the idea of ​​unifying national programs for the creation of orbital stations was born.

In March 1993, RSA General Director Yuri Koptev and General Designer of NPO Energia Yuri Semyonov proposed to NASA head Daniel Goldin to create the International Space Station.

In 1993, many politicians in the United States were against the construction of a space orbital station. In June 1993, the US Congress discussed a proposal to abandon the creation of the International Space Station. This proposal was not adopted by a margin of only one vote: 215 votes for refusal, 216 votes for building the station.

On September 2, 1993, US Vice President Al Gore and Chairman of the Russian Council of Ministers Viktor Chernomyrdin announced a new project for a “truly international space station.” From that moment on, the official name of the station became “International Space Station”, although at the same time the unofficial name was also used - the Alpha space station.

ISS, July 1999. At the top is the Unity module, at the bottom, with deployed solar panels - Zarya

On November 1, 1993, RSA and NASA signed a “Detailed Work Plan for the International Space Station.”

On June 23, 1994, Yuri Koptev and Daniel Goldin signed in Washington the “Interim Agreement to Conduct Work Leading to Russian Partnership in a Permanent Civilian Manned Space Station,” under which Russia officially joined work on the ISS.

November 1994 - the first consultations of the Russian and American space agencies took place in Moscow, contracts were concluded with the companies participating in the project - Boeing and RSC Energia. S. P. Koroleva.

March 1995 - at the Space Center. L. Johnson in Houston, the preliminary design of the station was approved.

1996 - station configuration approved. It consists of two segments - Russian (a modernized version of Mir-2) and American (with the participation of Canada, Japan, Italy, member countries of the European Space Agency and Brazil).

November 20, 1998 - Russia launched the first element of the ISS - the Zarya functional cargo block, which was launched by a Proton-K rocket (FGB).

December 7, 1998 - the shuttle Endeavor docked the American module Unity (Node-1) to the Zarya module.

On December 10, 1998, the hatch to the Unity module was opened and Kabana and Krikalev, as representatives of the United States and Russia, entered the station.

July 26, 2000 - the Zvezda service module (SM) was docked to the Zarya functional cargo block.

November 2, 2000 - the manned transport spacecraft (TPS) Soyuz TM-31 delivered the crew of the first main expedition to the ISS.

ISS, July 2000. Docked modules from top to bottom: Unity, Zarya, Zvezda and Progress ship

February 7, 2001 - the crew of the shuttle Atlantis during the STS-98 mission attached the American scientific module Destiny to the Unity module.

April 18, 2005 - NASA head Michael Griffin, at a hearing of the Senate Space and Science Committee, announced the need to temporarily reduce scientific research on the American segment of the station. This was required to free up funds for the accelerated development and construction of a new manned vehicle (CEV). A new manned spacecraft was needed to ensure independent US access to the station, since after the Columbia disaster on February 1, 2003, the US temporarily did not have such access to the station until July 2005, when shuttle flights resumed.

After the Columbia disaster, the number of long-term ISS crew members was reduced from three to two. This was due to the fact that the station was supplied with materials necessary for the life of the crew only by Russian Progress cargo ships.

On July 26, 2005, shuttle flights resumed with the successful launch of the Discovery shuttle. Until the end of the shuttle operation, it was planned to make 17 flights until 2010; during these flights, equipment and modules were delivered to the ISS necessary both for completing the construction of the station and for upgrading some of the equipment, in particular the Canadian manipulator.

The second shuttle flight after the Columbia disaster (Shuttle Discovery STS-121) took place in July 2006. On this shuttle, German cosmonaut Thomas Reiter arrived at the ISS and joined the crew of the long-term expedition ISS-13. Thus, after a three-year break, three cosmonauts again began working on a long-term expedition to the ISS.

ISS, April 2002

Launched on September 9, 2006, the Atlantis shuttle delivered to the ISS two segments of the ISS truss structures, two solar panels, as well as radiators for the thermal control system of the American segment.

On October 23, 2007, the American module Harmony arrived on board the Discovery shuttle. It was temporarily docked to the Unity module. After redocking on November 14, 2007, the Harmony module was permanently connected to the Destiny module. Construction of the main American segment of the ISS has been completed.

ISS, August 2005

In 2008, the station expanded by two laboratories. On February 11, the Columbus module, commissioned by the European Space Agency, was docked, and on March 14 and June 4, two of the three main compartments of the Kibo laboratory module, developed by the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, were docked - the pressurized section of the Experimental Cargo Bay (ELM) PS) and sealed compartment (PM).

In 2008-2009, the operation of new transport vehicles began: the European Space Agency "ATV" (the first launch took place on March 9, 2008, payload - 7.7 tons, 1 flight per year) and the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency "H-II Transport Vehicle "(the first launch took place on September 10, 2009, payload - 6 tons, 1 flight per year).

On May 29, 2009, the long-term ISS-20 crew of six people began work, delivered in two stages: the first three people arrived on Soyuz TMA-14, then they were joined by the Soyuz TMA-15 crew. To a large extent, the increase in crew was due to the increased ability to deliver cargo to the station.

ISS, September 2006

On November 12, 2009, the small research module MIM-2 was docked to the station, shortly before launch it was named “Poisk”. This is the fourth module of the Russian segment of the station, developed on the basis of the Pirs docking hub. The capabilities of the module allow it to carry out some scientific experiments, and also simultaneously serve as a berth for Russian ships.

On May 18, 2010, the Russian small research module Rassvet (MIR-1) was successfully docked to the ISS. The operation to dock Rassvet to the Russian functional cargo block Zarya was carried out by the manipulator of the American space shuttle Atlantis, and then by the ISS manipulator.

ISS, August 2007

In February 2010, the Multilateral Management Council for the International Space Station confirmed that there were no currently known technical restrictions on the continued operation of the ISS beyond 2015, and the US Administration had envisaged continued use of the ISS until at least 2020. NASA and Roscosmos are considering extending this deadline until at least 2024, with a possible extension until 2027. In May 2014, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin stated: "Russia does not intend to extend the operation of the International Space Station beyond 2020."

In 2011, flights of reusable spacecraft such as the Space Shuttle were completed.

ISS, June 2008

On May 22, 2012, a Falcon 9 rocket carrying a private space cargo ship, Dragon, was launched from the Cape Canaveral Space Center. This is the first-ever test flight of a private spacecraft to the International Space Station.

On May 25, 2012, the Dragon spacecraft became the first commercial spacecraft to dock with the ISS.

On September 18, 2013, the private automatic cargo supply spacecraft Cygnus approached the ISS for the first time and was docked.

ISS, March 2011

Planned Events

The plans include a significant modernization of the Russian Soyuz and Progress spacecraft.

In 2017, it is planned to dock the Russian 25-ton multifunctional laboratory module (MLM) Nauka to the ISS. It will take the place of the Pirs module, which will be undocked and flooded. Among other things, the new Russian module will completely take over the functions of Pirs.

“NEM-1” (scientific and energy module) - the first module, delivery is planned in 2018;

"NEM-2" (scientific and energy module) - the second module.

UM (nodal module) for the Russian segment - with additional docking nodes. Delivery is planned for 2017.

Station structure

The station design is based on a modular principle. The ISS is assembled by sequentially adding another module or block to the complex, which is connected to the one already delivered into orbit.

As of 2013, the ISS includes 14 main modules, Russian ones - “Zarya”, “Zvezda”, “Pirs”, “Poisk”, “Rassvet”; American - "Unity", "Destiny", "Quest", "Tranquility", "Dome", "Leonardo", "Harmony", European - "Columbus" and Japanese - "Kibo".

• "Zarya"- functional cargo module "Zarya", the first of the ISS modules delivered into orbit. Module weight - 20 tons, length - 12.6 m, diameter - 4 m, volume - 80 m³. Equipped with jet engines to correct the station's orbit and large solar panels. The module's service life is expected to be at least 15 years. The American financial contribution to the creation of Zarya is about $250 million, the Russian one - over $150 million;
• P.M. panel- anti-meteorite panel or anti-micrometeor protection, which, at the insistence of the American side, is mounted on the Zvezda module;
• "Star"- the Zvezda service module, which houses flight control systems, life support systems, an energy and information center, as well as cabins for astronauts. Module weight - 24 tons. The module is divided into five compartments and has four docking points. All its systems and units are Russian, with the exception of the on-board computer complex, created with the participation of European and American specialists;
• MIME- small research modules, two Russian cargo modules “Poisk” and “Rassvet”, designed to store equipment necessary for conducting scientific experiments. "Poisk" is docked to the anti-aircraft docking port of the Zvezda module, and "Rassvet" is docked to the nadir port of the Zarya module;
• "The science"- Russian multifunctional laboratory module, which provides conditions for storing scientific equipment, conducting scientific experiments, and temporary accommodation for the crew. Also provides the functionality of the European manipulator;
• ERA- European remote manipulator designed to move equipment located outside the station. Will be assigned to the Russian MLM scientific laboratory;
• Pressurized adapter- a sealed docking adapter designed to connect ISS modules to each other and to ensure docking of shuttles;
• "Calm"- ISS module performing life support functions. Contains systems for water recycling, air regeneration, waste disposal, etc. Connected to the Unity module;
• "Unity"- the first of three connecting modules of the ISS, which acts as a docking node and power switch for the modules “Quest”, “Nod-3”, farm Z1 and transport ships docked to it through Pressurized Adapter-3;
• "Pier"- mooring port intended for docking of Russian Progress and Soyuz aircraft; installed on the Zvezda module;
• VSP- external storage platforms: three external non-pressurized platforms intended exclusively for the storage of goods and equipment;
• Farms- a combined truss structure, on the elements of which solar panels, radiator panels and remote manipulators are installed. Also designed for non-hermetic storage of cargo and various equipment;
• "Canadarm2", or "Mobile Service System" - a Canadian system of remote manipulators, serving as the main tool for unloading transport ships and moving external equipment;
• "Dextre"- Canadian system of two remote manipulators, used to move equipment located outside the station;
• "Quest"- a specialized gateway module designed for spacewalks by cosmonauts and astronauts with the possibility of preliminary desaturation (washing out nitrogen from human blood);
• "Harmony"- a connecting module that acts as a docking unit and power switch for three scientific laboratories and transport ships docked to it via Hermoadapter-2. Contains additional life support systems;
• "Columbus"- a European laboratory module, in which, in addition to scientific equipment, network switches (hubs) are installed, providing communication between the station’s computer equipment. Docked to the Harmony module;
• "Destiny"- American laboratory module docked with the Harmony module;
• "Kibo"- Japanese laboratory module, consisting of three compartments and one main remote manipulator. The largest module of the station. Designed for conducting physical, biological, biotechnological and other scientific experiments in sealed and non-sealed conditions. In addition, thanks to its special design, it allows for unplanned experiments. Docked to the Harmony module;

ISS observation dome.

• "Dome"- transparent observation dome. Its seven windows (the largest is 80 cm in diameter) are used for conducting experiments, observing space and docking spacecraft, and also as a control panel for the station's main remote manipulator. Rest area for crew members. Designed and manufactured by the European Space Agency. Installed on the Tranquility node module;
• TSP- four unpressurized platforms fixed on trusses 3 and 4, designed to accommodate the equipment necessary for conducting scientific experiments in a vacuum. Provide processing and transmission of experimental results via high-speed channels to the station.
• Sealed multifunctional module- storage room for cargo storage, docked to the nadir docking port of the Destiny module.

In addition to the components listed above, there are three cargo modules: Leonardo, Raphael and Donatello, which are periodically delivered into orbit to equip the ISS with the necessary scientific equipment and other cargo. Modules with a common name "Multi-purpose supply module", were delivered in the cargo compartment of the shuttles and docked with the Unity module. Since March 2011, the converted Leonardo module has been one of the station's modules called the Permanent Multipurpose Module (PMM).

Power supply to the station

ISS in 2001. The solar panels of the Zarya and Zvezda modules are visible, as well as the P6 truss structure with American solar panels.

The only source of electrical energy for the ISS is the light of which the station's solar panels convert into electricity.

The Russian segment of the ISS uses a constant voltage of 28 volts, similar to that used on the Space Shuttle and Soyuz spacecraft. Electricity is generated directly by the solar panels of the Zarya and Zvezda modules, and can also be transmitted from the American segment to the Russian one through an ARCU voltage converter ( American-to-Russian converter unit) and in the opposite direction through the RACU voltage converter ( Russian-to-American converter unit).

It was originally planned that the station would be supplied with electricity using the Russian module of the Scientific Energy Platform (NEP). However, after the Columbia shuttle disaster, the station assembly program and the shuttle flight schedule were revised. Among other things, they also refused to deliver and install NEP, so at the moment most of the electricity is produced by solar panels in the American sector.

In the American segment, solar panels are organized as follows: two flexible folding solar panels form the so-called solar wing ( Solar Array Wing, SAW), a total of four pairs of such wings are located on the station's truss structures. Each wing has a length of 35 m and a width of 11.6 m, and its useful area is 298 m², while the total power generated by it can reach 32.8 kW. Solar panels generate a primary DC voltage of 115 to 173 Volts, which is then, using DDCU units, Direct Current to Direct Current Converter Unit ), is transformed into a secondary stabilized direct voltage of 124 Volts. This stabilized voltage is directly used to power the electrical equipment of the American segment of the station.

Solar battery on the ISS

The station makes one revolution around the Earth in 90 minutes and spends about half of this time in the Earth's shadow, where solar panels do not work. Its power supply then comes from nickel-hydrogen buffer batteries, which are recharged when the ISS returns to sunlight. The battery life is 6.5 years, and it is expected that they will be replaced several times during the life of the station. The first battery change was carried out on the P6 segment during the astronauts' spacewalk during the flight of the shuttle Endeavor STS-127 in July 2009.

Under normal conditions, the US sector's solar arrays track the Sun to maximize energy production. Solar panels are aimed at the Sun using “Alpha” and “Beta” drives. The station is equipped with two Alpha drives, which rotate several sections with solar panels located on them around the longitudinal axis of truss structures: the first drive turns sections from P4 to P6, the second - from S4 to S6. Each wing of the solar battery has its own Beta drive, which ensures rotation of the wing relative to its longitudinal axis.

When the ISS is in the shadow of the Earth, the solar panels are switched to Night Glider mode ( English) (“Night planning mode”), in which case they turn with their edges in the direction of movement in order to reduce the resistance of the atmosphere that is present at the station’s flight altitude.

Means of communication

The transmission of telemetry and the exchange of scientific data between the station and the Mission Control Center is carried out using radio communications. In addition, radio communications are used during rendezvous and docking operations; they are used for audio and video communication between crew members and with flight control specialists on Earth, as well as relatives and friends of the astronauts. Thus, the ISS is equipped with internal and external multi-purpose communication systems.

The Russian segment of the ISS communicates directly with Earth using the Lyra radio antenna installed on the Zvezda module. "Lira" makes it possible to use the "Luch" satellite data relay system. This system was used to communicate with the Mir station, but it fell into disrepair in the 1990s and is not currently used. To restore the system's functionality, Luch-5A was launched in 2012. In May 2014, 3 Luch multifunctional space relay systems were operating in orbit - Luch-5A, Luch-5B and Luch-5V. In 2014, it is planned to install specialized subscriber equipment on the Russian segment of the station.

Another Russian communication system, Voskhod-M, provides telephone communication between the Zvezda, Zarya, Pirs, Poisk modules and the American segment, as well as VHF radio communication with ground control centers using external antennas. module "Zvezda".

In the American segment, for communication in the S-band (audio transmission) and K u-band (audio, video, data transmission), two separate systems are used, located on the Z1 truss structure. Radio signals from these systems are transmitted to American TDRSS geostationary satellites, which allows for almost continuous contact with mission control in Houston. Data from Canadarm2, the European Columbus module and the Japanese Kibo module are redirected through these two communication systems, however, the American TDRSS data transmission system will eventually be supplemented by the European satellite system (EDRS) and a similar Japanese one. Communication between modules is carried out via an internal digital wireless network.

During spacewalks, astronauts use a UHF VHF transmitter. VHF radio communications are also used during docking or undocking by the Soyuz, Progress, HTV, ATV and Space Shuttle spacecraft (although the shuttles also use S- and K u-band transmitters via TDRSS). With its help, these spacecraft receive commands from the Mission Control Center or from the ISS crew members. Automatic spacecraft are equipped with their own means of communication. Thus, ATV ships use a specialized system during rendezvous and docking Proximity Communication Equipment (PCE), the equipment of which is located on the ATV and on the Zvezda module. Communication is carried out through two completely independent S-band radio channels. PCE begins to function starting from relative ranges of about 30 kilometers, and is turned off after the ATV docks with the ISS and switches to interaction via the on-board MIL-STD-1553 bus. To accurately determine the relative position of the ATV and the ISS, a laser rangefinder system installed on the ATV is used, making precise docking with the station possible.

The station is equipped with approximately one hundred ThinkPad laptop computers from IBM and Lenovo, models A31 and T61P, running Debian GNU/Linux. These are ordinary serial computers, which, however, have been modified for use in the ISS conditions, in particular, the connectors and cooling system have been redesigned, the 28 Volt voltage used at the station has been taken into account, and the safety requirements for working in zero gravity have been met. Since January 2010, the station has provided direct Internet access for the American segment. Computers on board the ISS are connected via Wi-Fi to a wireless network and are connected to the Earth at a speed of 3 Mbit/s for downloading and 10 Mbit/s for downloading, which is comparable to a home ADSL connection.

Bathroom for astronauts

The toilet on the OS is designed for both men and women; it looks exactly the same as on Earth, but has a number of design features. The toilet is equipped with leg clamps and thigh holders, and powerful air pumps are built into it. The astronaut is fastened with a special spring mount to the toilet seat, then turns on a powerful fan and opens the suction hole, where the air flow carries away all the waste.

On the ISS, air from toilets is necessarily filtered before entering living quarters to remove bacteria and odor.

Greenhouse for astronauts

Fresh greens grown in microgravity are being officially included on the International Space Station menu for the first time. On August 10, 2015, astronauts will try lettuce collected from the orbital Veggie plantation. Many media outlets reported that for the first time, astronauts tried their own homegrown food, but this experiment was carried out at the Mir station.

Scientific research

One of the main goals when creating the ISS was the ability to conduct experiments at the station that require unique space flight conditions: microgravity, vacuum, cosmic radiation not weakened by the earth’s atmosphere. Major areas of research include biology (including biomedical research and biotechnology), physics (including fluid physics, materials science and quantum physics), astronomy, cosmology and meteorology. Research is carried out using scientific equipment, mainly located in specialized scientific modules-laboratories; some of the equipment for experiments requiring vacuum is fixed outside the station, outside its hermetic volume.

ISS scientific modules

Currently (January 2012), the station includes three special scientific modules - the American laboratory Destiny, launched in February 2001, the European research module Columbus, delivered to the station in February 2008, and the Japanese research module Kibo " The European research module is equipped with 10 racks in which instruments for research in various fields of science are installed. Some racks are specialized and equipped for research in the fields of biology, biomedicine and fluid physics. The remaining racks are universal; the equipment in them can change depending on the experiments being carried out.

The Japanese research module Kibo consists of several parts that were sequentially delivered and installed in orbit. The first compartment of the Kibo module is a sealed experimental transport compartment. JEM Experiment Logistics Module - Pressurized Section ) was delivered to the station in March 2008, during the flight of the Endeavor shuttle STS-123. The last part of the Kibo module was attached to the station in July 2009, when the shuttle delivered a leaky experimental transport compartment to the ISS. Experiment Logistics Module, Unpressurized Section ).

Russia has two “Small Research Modules” (SRM) at the orbital station - “Poisk” and “Rassvet”. It is also planned to deliver the multifunctional laboratory module “Nauka” (MLM) into orbit. Only the latter will have full-fledged scientific capabilities; the amount of scientific equipment located at two MIMs is minimal.

Collaborative experiments

The international nature of the ISS project facilitates joint scientific experiments. Such cooperation is most widely developed by European and Russian scientific institutions under the auspices of ESA and the Russian Federal Space Agency. Well-known examples of such cooperation were the “Plasma Crystal” experiment, dedicated to the physics of dusty plasma, and conducted by the Institute of Extraterrestrial Physics of the Max Planck Society, the Institute of High Temperatures and the Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as a number of other scientific institutions in Russia and Germany, the medical and biological experiment “ Matryoshka-R”, in which mannequins are used to determine the absorbed dose of ionizing radiation - equivalents of biological objects created at the Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Cologne Institute of Space Medicine.

The Russian side is also a contractor for contract experiments of ESA and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. For example, Russian cosmonauts tested the ROKVISS robotic experimental system. Robotic Components Verification on ISS- testing of robotic components on the ISS), developed at the Institute of Robotics and Mechanotronics, located in Wessling, near Munich, Germany.

Russian studies

Comparison between burning a candle on Earth (left) and in microgravity on the ISS (right)

In 1995, a competition was announced among Russian scientific and educational institutions, industrial organizations to conduct scientific research on the Russian segment of the ISS. In eleven main areas of research, 406 applications were received from eighty organizations. After RSC Energia specialists assessed the technical feasibility of these applications, in 1999 the “Long-term program of scientific and applied research and experiments planned on the Russian segment of the ISS” was adopted. The program was approved by the President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Yu. S. Osipov and the General Director of the Russian Aviation and Space Agency (now FKA) Yu. N. Koptev. The first research on the Russian segment of the ISS was started by the first manned expedition in 2000. According to the original ISS design, it was planned to launch two large Russian research modules (RM). The electricity needed to conduct scientific experiments was to be provided by the Scientific Energy Platform (SEP). However, due to underfunding and delays in the construction of the ISS, all these plans were canceled in favor of building a single scientific module, which did not require large costs and additional orbital infrastructure. A significant part of the research carried out by Russia on the ISS is contractual or joint with foreign partners.

Currently, various medical, biological, and physical studies are being conducted on the ISS.

Research on the American segment

Epstein-Barr virus shown using fluorescent antibody staining technique

The United States is conducting an extensive research program on the ISS. Many of these experiments are a continuation of research carried out during shuttle flights with the Spacelab modules and in the Mir-Shuttle program jointly with Russia. An example is the study of the pathogenicity of one of the causative agents of herpes, the Epstein-Barr virus. According to statistics, 90% of the adult US population are carriers of the latent form of this virus. During space flight, the immune system weakens; the virus can become active and cause illness in a crew member. Experiments to study the virus began on the flight of the shuttle STS-108.

European studies

Solar observatory installed on the Columbus module

The European Science Module Columbus has 10 integrated payload racks (ISPRs), although some of them, by agreement, will be used in NASA experiments. For the needs of ESA, the following scientific equipment is installed in the racks: the Biolab laboratory for conducting biological experiments, the Fluid Science Laboratory for research in the field of fluid physics, the European Physiology Modules installation for physiological experiments, as well as the universal European Drawer Rack containing equipment for conducting experiments on protein crystallization (PCDF).

During STS-122, external experimental facilities were also installed for the Columbus module: the EuTEF remote technology experiment platform and the SOLAR solar observatory. It is planned to add an external laboratory for testing general relativity and string theory, Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space.

Japanese studies

The research program carried out on the Kibo module includes studying the processes of global warming on Earth, the ozone layer and surface desertification, and conducting astronomical research in the X-ray range.

Experiments are planned to create large and identical protein crystals, which are intended to help understand the mechanisms of diseases and develop new treatments. In addition, the effect of microgravity and radiation on plants, animals and people will be studied, and experiments will also be conducted in robotics, communications and energy.

In April 2009, Japanese astronaut Koichi Wakata conducted a series of experiments on the ISS, which were selected from those proposed by ordinary citizens. The astronaut attempted to "swim" in zero gravity using a variety of strokes, including crawl and butterfly. However, none of them allowed the astronaut to even budge. The astronaut noted that “even large sheets of paper cannot correct the situation if you pick them up and use them as flippers.” In addition, the astronaut wanted to juggle a soccer ball, but this attempt was unsuccessful. Meanwhile, the Japanese managed to send the ball back over his head. Having completed these difficult exercises in zero gravity, the Japanese astronaut tried push-ups and rotations on the spot.

Security questions

Space debris

A hole in the radiator panel of the shuttle Endeavor STS-118, formed as a result of a collision with space debris

Since the ISS moves in a relatively low orbit, there is a certain probability that the station or astronauts going into outer space will collide with so-called space debris. This can include both large objects such as rocket stages or failed satellites, and small ones such as slag from solid rocket engines, coolants from reactor installations of US-A series satellites, and other substances and objects. In addition, natural objects such as micrometeorites pose an additional threat. Considering the cosmic speeds in orbit, even small objects can cause serious damage to the station, and in the event of a possible hit in a cosmonaut’s spacesuit, micrometeorites can pierce the casing and cause depressurization.

To avoid such collisions, remote monitoring of the movement of elements of space debris is carried out from Earth. If such a threat appears at a certain distance from the ISS, the station crew receives a corresponding warning. The astronauts will have enough time to activate the DAM system. Debris Avoidance Manoeuvre), which is a group of propulsion systems from the Russian segment of the station. When the engines are turned on, they can propel the station into a higher orbit and thus avoid a collision. In case of late detection of danger, the crew is evacuated from the ISS on Soyuz spacecraft. Partial evacuation occurred on the ISS: April 6, 2003, March 13, 2009, June 29, 2011, and March 24, 2012.

Radiation

In the absence of the massive atmospheric layer that surrounds people on Earth, astronauts on the ISS are exposed to more intense radiation from constant streams of cosmic rays. Crew members receive a radiation dose of about 1 millisievert per day, which is approximately equivalent to the radiation exposure of a person on Earth in a year. This leads to an increased risk of developing malignant tumors in astronauts, as well as a weakened immune system. The weak immunity of astronauts can contribute to the spread of infectious diseases among crew members, especially in the confined space of the station. Despite efforts to improve radiation protection mechanisms, the level of radiation penetration has not changed much compared to previous studies conducted, for example, at the Mir station.

Station body surface

During an inspection of the outer skin of the ISS, traces of marine plankton were found on scrapings from the surface of the hull and windows. The need to clean the outer surface of the station due to contamination from the operation of spacecraft engines was also confirmed.

Legal side

Legal levels

The legal framework governing the legal aspects of the space station is diverse and consists of four levels:

• First The level establishing the rights and obligations of the parties is the “Intergovernmental Agreement on the Space Station” (eng. Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement - I.G.A. ), signed on January 29, 1998 by fifteen governments of countries participating in the project - Canada, Russia, USA, Japan, and eleven member states of the European Space Agency (Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, France, Switzerland and Sweden). Article No. 1 of this document reflects the main principles of the project:
  This agreement is a long-term international framework based on genuine partnership for the comprehensive design, creation, development and long-term use of a manned civil space station for peaceful purposes, in accordance with international law. When writing this agreement, the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, ratified by 98 countries, which borrowed the traditions of international maritime and air law, was taken as a basis.
• The first level of partnership is the basis second level, which is called “Memorandums of Understanding” (eng. Memoranda of Understanding - MOU s ). These memoranda represent agreements between NASA and the four national space agencies: FSA, ESA, CSA and JAXA. Memoranda are used to describe in more detail the roles and responsibilities of partners. Moreover, since NASA is the designated manager of the ISS, there are no direct agreements between these organizations, only with NASA.
• TO third This level includes barter agreements or agreements on the rights and obligations of the parties - for example, the 2005 commercial agreement between NASA and Roscosmos, the terms of which included one guaranteed place for an American astronaut on the crew of Soyuz spacecraft and a portion of the payload for American cargo on unmanned " Progress."
• Fourth the legal level complements the second (“Memorandums”) and puts into effect certain provisions from it. An example of this is the “Code of Conduct on the ISS,” which was developed in pursuance of paragraph 2 of Article 11 of the Memorandum of Understanding - legal aspects of ensuring subordination, discipline, physical and information security, and other rules of conduct for crew members.

Ownership structure

The project's ownership structure does not provide for its members a clearly established percentage for the use of the space station as a whole. According to Article No. 5 (IGA), the jurisdiction of each of the partners extends only to that component of the plant that is registered with it, and violations of legal norms by personnel, inside or outside the plant, are subject to proceedings according to the laws of the country of which they are citizens.

Interior of the Zarya module

Agreements for the use of ISS resources are more complex. The Russian modules “Zvezda”, “Pirs”, “Poisk” and “Rassvet” were manufactured and owned by Russia, which retains the right to use them. The planned Nauka module will also be manufactured in Russia and will be included in the Russian segment of the station. The Zarya module was built and delivered into orbit by the Russian side, but this was done with US funds, so NASA is officially the owner of this module today. To use Russian modules and other components of the station, partner countries use additional bilateral agreements (the above-mentioned third and fourth legal levels).

The rest of the station (US modules, European and Japanese modules, truss structures, solar panels and two robotic arms) is used as agreed by the parties as follows (as a % of total time of use):

1. Columbus - 51% for ESA, 49% for NASA
2. "Kibo" - 51% for JAXA, 49% for NASA
3. Destiny - 100% for NASA

In addition to this:

• NASA can use 100% of the truss area;
• Under an agreement with NASA, KSA can use 2.3% of any non-Russian components;
• Crew working time, solar power, use of support services (loading/unloading, communications services) - 76.6% for NASA, 12.8% for JAXA, 8.3% for ESA and 2.3% for CSA.

Legal curiosities

Before the flight of the first space tourist, there was no regulatory framework governing private space flights. But after the flight of Dennis Tito, the countries participating in the project developed “Principles” that defined such a concept as a “Space Tourist” and all the necessary issues for his participation in the visiting expedition. In particular, such a flight is possible only if there are specific medical indicators, psychological fitness, language training, and a financial contribution.

The participants of the first space wedding in 2003 found themselves in the same situation, since such a procedure was also not regulated by any laws.

In 2000, the Republican majority in the US Congress adopted a legislative act on the non-proliferation of missile and nuclear technologies in Iran, according to which, in particular, the United States could not purchase equipment and ships from Russia necessary for the construction of the ISS. However, after the Columbia disaster, when the fate of the project depended on the Russian Soyuz and Progress, on October 26, 2005, Congress was forced to adopt amendments to this bill, removing all restrictions on “any protocols, agreements, memorandums of understanding or contracts” , until January 1, 2012.

Costs

The costs of building and operating the ISS turned out to be much higher than originally planned. In 2005, ESA estimated that around €100 billion ($157 billion or £65.3 billion) would have been spent between the start of work on the ISS project in the late 1980s and its then expected completion in 2010. However, as of today, the end of operation of the station is planned no earlier than 2024, due to the request of the United States, which is unable to undock its segment and continue to fly, the total costs of all countries are estimated at a larger amount.

It is very difficult to accurately estimate the cost of the ISS. For example, it is unclear how Russia's contribution should be calculated, since Roscosmos uses significantly lower dollar rates than other partners.

NASA

Assessing the project as a whole, the largest costs for NASA are the complex of flight support activities and the costs of managing the ISS. In other words, current operating costs account for a much larger portion of the funds spent than the costs of building modules and other station equipment, training crews, and delivery ships.

NASA's spending on the ISS, excluding Shuttle costs, from 1994 to 2005 was $25.6 billion. 2005 and 2006 accounted for approximately $1.8 billion. Annual costs are expected to increase, reaching $2.3 billion by 2010. Then, until the completion of the project in 2016, no increase is planned, only inflationary adjustments.

Distribution of budget funds

An itemized list of NASA's costs can be assessed, for example, from a document published by the space agency, which shows how the $1.8 billion spent by NASA on the ISS in 2005 was distributed:

• Research and development of new equipment- 70 million dollars. This amount was, in particular, spent on the development of navigation systems, information support, and technologies to reduce environmental pollution.
• Flight support- 800 million dollars. This amount included: on a per-ship basis, $125 million for software, spacewalks, supply and maintenance of shuttles; an additional $150 million was spent on the flights themselves, avionics, and crew-ship interaction systems; the remaining $250 million went to general management of the ISS.
• Launching ships and conducting expeditions- $125 million for pre-launch operations at the cosmodrome; $25 million for health care; $300 million spent on expedition management;
• Flight program- $350 million was spent on developing the flight program, maintaining ground equipment and software, for guaranteed and uninterrupted access to the ISS.
• Cargo and crews- $140 million was spent on the purchase of consumables, as well as the ability to deliver cargo and crews on Russian Progress and Soyuz aircraft.

Cost of the Shuttle as part of the cost of the ISS

Of the ten planned flights remaining until 2010, only one STS-125 flew not to the station, but to the Hubble telescope.

As mentioned above, NASA does not include the cost of the Shuttle program in the station's main cost item, since it positions it as a separate project, independent of the ISS. However, from December 1998 to May 2008, only 5 of 31 shuttle flights were not associated with the ISS, and of the remaining eleven planned flights until 2011, only one STS-125 flew not to the station, but to the Hubble telescope.

The approximate costs of the Shuttle program for the delivery of cargo and astronaut crews to the ISS were:

• Excluding the first flight in 1998, from 1999 to 2005, costs amounted to $24 billion. Of these, 20% ($5 billion) were not related to the ISS. Total - 19 billion dollars.
• From 1996 to 2006, it was planned to spend $20.5 billion on flights under the Shuttle program. If we subtract the flight to Hubble from this amount, we end up with the same 19 billion dollars.

That is, NASA’s total costs for flights to the ISS for the entire period will be approximately $38 billion.

Total

Taking into account NASA's plans for the period from 2011 to 2017, as a first approximation, we can obtain an average annual expenditure of $2.5 billion, which for the subsequent period from 2006 to 2017 will be $27.5 billion. Knowing the costs of the ISS from 1994 to 2005 ($25.6 billion) and adding these figures, we get the final official result - $53 billion.

It should also be noted that this figure does not include the significant costs of designing the Freedom space station in the 1980s and early 1990s, and participation in the joint program with Russia to use the Mir station in the 1990s. The developments of these two projects were repeatedly used during the construction of the ISS. Considering this circumstance, and taking into account the situation with the Shuttles, we can talk about a more than double increase in the amount of expenses compared to the official one - more than $100 billion for the United States alone.

ESA

ESA has calculated that its contribution over the 15 years of the project's existence will be 9 billion euros. Costs for the Columbus module exceed 1.4 billion euros (approximately $2.1 billion), including costs for ground control and control systems. The total development cost of the ATV is approximately 1.35 billion euros, with each Ariane 5 launch costing approximately 150 million euros.

JAXA

The development of the Japanese Experimental Module, JAXA's main contribution to the ISS, cost approximately 325 billion yen (approximately $2.8 billion).

In 2005, JAXA allocated approximately 40 billion yen (350 million USD) to the ISS program. The annual operating costs of the Japanese experimental module are $350-400 million. In addition, JAXA has committed to developing and launching the H-II transport vehicle, at a total development cost of $1 billion. JAXA's expenses over the 24 years of its participation in the ISS program will exceed $10 billion.

Roscosmos

A significant portion of the Russian Space Agency's budget is spent on the ISS. Since 1998, more than three dozen flights of the Soyuz and Progress spacecraft have been made, which since 2003 have become the main means of delivering cargo and crews. However, the question of how much Russia spends on the station (in US dollars) is not simple. The currently existing 2 modules in orbit are derivatives of the Mir program, and therefore the costs of their development are much lower than for other modules, however, in this case, by analogy with the American programs, the costs of developing the corresponding station modules should also be taken into account. World". In addition, the exchange rate between the ruble and the dollar does not adequately assess the actual costs of Roscosmos.

A rough idea of ​​the Russian space agency's expenses on the ISS can be obtained from its total budget, which for 2005 amounted to 25.156 billion rubles, for 2006 - 31.806, for 2007 - 32.985 and for 2008 - 37.044 billion rubles. Thus, the station costs less than one and a half billion US dollars per year.

CSA

The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is a long-term partner of NASA, so Canada has been involved in the ISS project from the very beginning. Canada's contribution to the ISS is a mobile maintenance system consisting of three parts: a mobile cart that can move along the station's truss structure, a robotic arm called Canadarm2 (Canadarm2), which is mounted on a mobile cart, and a special manipulator called Dextre. ). Over the past 20 years, CSA is estimated to have invested C$1.4 billion into the station.

Criticism

In the entire history of astronautics, the ISS is the most expensive and, perhaps, the most criticized space project. Criticism can be considered constructive or short-sighted, you can agree with it or dispute it, but one thing remains unchanged: the station exists, with its existence it proves the possibility of international cooperation in space and increases humanity’s experience in space flight, spending enormous financial resources on this.

Criticism in the US

The American side's criticism is mainly directed at the cost of the project, which already exceeds $100 billion. This money, according to critics, could be better spent on automated (unmanned) flights to explore near space or on scientific projects carried out on Earth. In response to some of these criticisms, human spaceflight advocates say that criticism of the ISS project is short-sighted and that the return on human spaceflight and space exploration is in the billions of dollars. Jerome Schnee (English) Jerome Schnee) estimated the indirect economic component of additional revenues associated with space exploration to be many times greater than the initial government investment.

However, a statement from the Federation of American Scientists argues that NASA's profit margin on spin-off revenue is actually very low, except for aeronautical developments that improve aircraft sales.

Critics also say that NASA often counts among its achievements the development of third-party companies whose ideas and developments may have been used by NASA, but had other prerequisites independent of astronautics. What is truly useful and profitable, according to critics, are unmanned navigation, meteorological and military satellites. NASA widely publicizes additional revenues from the construction of the ISS and the work performed on it, while NASA's official list of expenses is much more brief and secretive.

Criticism of scientific aspects

According to Professor Robert Park Robert Park), most of the planned scientific research is not of primary importance. He notes that the goal of most scientific research in a space laboratory is to conduct it in microgravity conditions, which can be done much more cheaply in conditions of artificial weightlessness (in a special plane that flies along a parabolic trajectory). reduced gravity aircraft).

The ISS construction plans included two high-tech components - a magnetic alpha spectrometer and a centrifuge module. Centrifuge Accommodations Module) . The first one has been working at the station since May 2011. The creation of a second one was abandoned in 2005 as a result of a correction in plans for completing construction of the station. Highly specialized experiments carried out on the ISS are limited by the lack of appropriate equipment. For example, in 2007, studies were carried out on the influence of space flight factors on the human body, touching on such aspects as kidney stones, circadian rhythm (the cyclical nature of biological processes in the human body), and the influence of cosmic radiation on the human nervous system. Critics argue that these studies have little practical value, since the reality of today's near-space exploration is unmanned robotic ships.

Criticism of technical aspects

American journalist Jeff Faust Jeff Foust) argued that maintenance of the ISS required too many expensive and dangerous spacewalks. Pacific Astronomical Society The Astronomical Society of the Pacific) At the beginning of the design of the ISS, attention was paid to the too high inclination of the station's orbit. While this makes launches cheaper for the Russian side, it is unprofitable for the American side. The concession that NASA made for the Russian Federation due to the geographical location of Baikonur may ultimately increase the total costs of building the ISS.

In general, the debate in American society boils down to a discussion of the feasibility of the ISS, in the aspect of astronautics in a broader sense. Some advocates argue that, in addition to its scientific value, it is an important example of international cooperation. Others argue that the ISS could potentially, with proper effort and improvements, make flights more cost-effective. One way or another, the main essence of the statements in response to criticism is that it is difficult to expect a serious financial return from the ISS; rather, its main purpose is to become part of the global expansion of space flight capabilities.

Criticism in Russia

In Russia, criticism of the ISS project is mainly aimed at the inactive position of the leadership of the Federal Space Agency (FSA) in defending Russian interests in comparison with the American side, which always strictly monitors compliance with its national priorities.

For example, journalists ask questions about why Russia does not have its own orbital station project, and why money is being spent on a project owned by the United States, while these funds could be spent on completely Russian development. According to Vitaly Lopota, head of RSC Energia, the reason for this is contractual obligations and lack of funding.

At one time, the Mir station became for the United States a source of experience in construction and research on the ISS, and after the Columbia accident, the Russian side, acting in accordance with a partnership agreement with NASA and delivering equipment and cosmonauts to the station, almost single-handedly saved the project. These circumstances gave rise to critical statements addressed to the FKA about underestimating the role of Russia in the project. For example, cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya noted that Russia’s scientific and technical contribution to the project is underestimated, and that the partnership agreement with NASA does not meet national interests financially. However, it is worth considering that at the beginning of the construction of the ISS, the Russian segment of the station was paid for by the United States, providing loans, the repayment of which is provided only at the end of construction.

Speaking about the scientific and technical component, journalists note the small number of new scientific experiments carried out at the station, explaining this by the fact that Russia cannot manufacture and supply the necessary equipment to the station due to lack of funds. According to Vitaly Lopota, the situation will change when the simultaneous presence of astronauts on the ISS increases to 6 people. In addition, questions are raised about security measures in force majeure situations associated with a possible loss of control of the station. Thus, according to cosmonaut Valery Ryumin, the danger is that if the ISS becomes uncontrollable, it will not be able to be flooded like the Mir station.

International cooperation, which is one of the main selling points for the station, is also controversial, according to critics. As is known, according to the terms of the international agreement, countries are not obliged to share their scientific developments at the station. During 2006-2007, there were no new major initiatives or major projects in the space sector between Russia and the United States. In addition, many believe that a country that invests 75% of its funds in its project is unlikely to want to have a full partner, which is also its main competitor in the struggle for a leading position in outer space.

It is also criticized that significant funds have been allocated to manned programs, and a number of satellite development programs have failed. In 2003, Yuri Koptev, in an interview with Izvestia, stated that for the sake of the ISS, space science again remained on Earth.

In 2014-2015, experts in the Russian space industry formed the opinion that the practical benefits of orbital stations had already been exhausted - over the past decades, all practically important research and discoveries had been made:

The era of orbital stations, which began in 1971, will be a thing of the past. Experts do not see any practical feasibility either in maintaining the ISS after 2020, or in creating an alternative station with similar functionality: “The scientific and practical returns from the Russian segment of the ISS are significantly lower than from the Salyut-7 and Mir orbital complexes.” Scientific organizations are not interested in repeating what has already been done.

Expert magazine 2015

Delivery ships

The crews of manned expeditions to the ISS are delivered to the station at the Soyuz TPK according to a “short” six-hour schedule. Until March 2013, all expeditions flew to the ISS on a two-day schedule. Until July 2011, cargo delivery, installation of station elements, crew rotation, in addition to the Soyuz TPK, were carried out within the framework of the Space Shuttle program, until the program was completed.

Table of flights of all manned and transport spacecraft to the ISS:

Ship	Type	Agency/country	First flight	Last flight	Total flights

The idea of ​​creating an international space station arose in the early 1990s. The project became international when Canada, Japan and the European Space Agency joined the United States. In December 1993, the United States, together with other countries participating in the creation of the Alpha space station, invited Russia to become a partner in this project. The Russian government accepted the proposal, after which some experts began calling the project “Ralfa,” that is, “Russian Alpha,” recalls NASA public affairs representative Ellen Kline.

According to experts, construction of Alfa-R could be completed by 2002 and would cost approximately $17.5 billion. “It's very cheap,” said NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin. - If we worked alone, the costs would be high. And so, thanks to cooperation with the Russians, we receive not only political, but also material benefits..."

It was finance, or rather the lack of it, that forced NASA to look for partners. The initial project - it was called “Freedom” - was very grandiose. It was assumed that at the station it would be possible to repair satellites and entire spaceships, study the functioning of the human body during a long stay in weightlessness, conduct astronomical research and even set up production.

The Americans were also attracted to the unique methods, which were supported by millions of rubles and years of work by Soviet scientists and engineers. Having worked in the same team with the Russians, they received a fairly complete understanding of Russian methods, technologies, etc., relating to long-term orbital stations. It is difficult to estimate how many billions of dollars they are worth.

The Americans manufactured a scientific laboratory, a residential module, and Node-1 and Node-2 docking blocks for the station. The Russian side developed and supplied a functional cargo unit, a universal docking module, transport supply ships, a service module and a Proton launch vehicle.

Most of the work was carried out by the State Space Research and Production Center named after M.V. Khrunichev. The central part of the station was the functional cargo block, similar in size and basic design elements to the Kvant-2 and Kristall modules of the Mir station. Its diameter is 4 meters, length is 13 meters, weight is more than 19 tons. The block serves as a home for astronauts during the initial period of assembling the station, as well as for providing it with electricity from solar panels and storing fuel reserves for propulsion systems. The service module is based on the central part of the Mir-2 station developed in the 1980s. Astronauts live there permanently and conduct experiments.

Participants of the European Space Agency developed the Columbus laboratory and an automatic transport ship for the launch vehicle

Ariane 5, Canada supplied the mobile service system, Japan - the experimental module.

Assembling the international space station required approximately 28 flights on American space shuttles, 17 launches of Russian launch vehicles and one launch of Ariana 5. 29 Russian Soyuz-TM and Progress spacecraft were to deliver crews and equipment to the station.

The total internal volume of the station after its assembly in orbit was 1217 square meters, the mass was 377 tons, of which 140 tons were Russian components, 37 tons were American. The estimated operating time of the international station is 15 years.

Due to financial troubles plaguing the Russian Aerospace Agency, the construction of the ISS was behind schedule for two whole years. But finally, on July 20, 1998, from the Baikonur cosmodrome, the Proton launch vehicle launched the Zarya functional unit into orbit - the first element of the international space station. And on July 26, 2000, our Zvezda connected with the ISS.

This day went down in the history of its creation as one of the most important. At the Johnson Manned Space Flight Center in Houston and at the Russian Mission Control Center in the city of Korolev, the hands on the clocks show different times, but the applause broke out at the same time.

Until that time, the ISS was a set of lifeless building blocks; Zvezda breathed a “soul” into it: a scientific laboratory suitable for life and long-term fruitful work appeared in orbit. This is a fundamentally new stage in a grandiose international experiment in which 16 countries are participating.

“The gates are now open for continued construction of the International Space Station,” said NASA spokesman Kyle Herring with satisfaction. The ISS currently consists of three elements - the Zvezda service module and the Zarya functional cargo module, built by Russia, as well as the Unity docking port, built by the United States. With the docking of the new module, the station not only grew noticeably, but also became heavier, as much as possible in zero gravity conditions, gaining a total of about 60 tons.

After this, a kind of rod was assembled in near-Earth orbit, on which more and more new structural elements can be “strung”. “Zvezda” is the cornerstone of the entire future space structure, comparable in size to a city block. Scientists claim that the fully assembled station will be the third brightest object in the starry sky - after the Moon and Venus. It can be observed even with the naked eye.

The Russian block, costing $340 million, is the key element that ensures the transition from quantity to quality. The “star” is the “brain” of the ISS. The Russian module is not only the place of residence of the first crews of the station. The Zvezda carries a powerful central on-board computer and communications equipment, a life support system and a propulsion system that will ensure the ISS's orientation and orbital altitude. From now on, all crews arriving on the Shuttle during work on board the station will no longer rely on the systems of the American spacecraft, but on the life support of the ISS itself. And “Star” guarantees this.

“The docking of the Russian module and the station took place approximately at an altitude of 370 kilometers above the surface of the planet,” writes Vladimir Rogachev in the journal Echo of the Planet. - At that moment, the spacecraft were racing at a speed of about 27 thousand kilometers per hour. The operation carried out earned the highest marks from experts, once again confirming the reliability of Russian technology and the highest professionalism of its creators. As Sergei Kulik, a representative of Rosaviakosmos, who is in Houston, emphasized in a telephone conversation with me, both American and Russian specialists were well aware that they were witnesses to a historical event. My interlocutor also noted that specialists from the European Space Agency, who created the Zvezda central on-board computer, also made an important contribution to ensuring the docking.

Then Sergei Krikalev picked up the phone, who, as part of the first long-stay crew starting from Baikonur at the end of October, will have to settle into the ISS. Sergei noted that everyone in Houston was awaiting the moment of contact with the spacecraft with enormous tension. Moreover, after the automatic docking mode was activated, very little could be done “from the outside.” The accomplished event, the cosmonaut explained, opens up prospects for the development of work on the ISS and the continuation of the manned flight program. In essence, this is “..a continuation of the Soyuz-Apollo program, the 25th anniversary of the completion of which is being celebrated these days. The Russians have already flown on the Shuttle, the Americans on the Mir, and now a new stage is coming.”

Maria Ivatsevich, representing the Research and Production Space Center named after M.V. Khrunicheva, especially noted that the docking, carried out without any glitches or comments, “became the most serious, key stage of the program.”

The result was summed up by the commander of the first planned long-term expedition to the ISS, American William Sheppard. “It is obvious that the torch of competition has now passed from Russia to the United States and the other partners of the international project,” he said. “We are ready to accept this load, understanding that maintaining the station’s construction schedule depends on us.”

In March 2001, the ISS was nearly damaged by space debris. It is noteworthy that it could have been rammed by a part from the station itself, which was lost during the spacewalk of astronauts James Voss and Susan Helms. As a result of the maneuver, the ISS managed to avoid a collision.

For the ISS, this was not the first threat posed by debris flying in outer space. In June 1999, when the station was still uninhabited, there was a threat of its collision with a piece of the upper stage of a space rocket. Then specialists from the Russian Mission Control Center in the city of Korolev managed to give the command for the maneuver. As a result, the fragment flew past at a distance of 6.5 kilometers, which is minuscule by cosmic standards.

Now the American Mission Control Center in Houston has demonstrated its ability to act in a critical situation. After receiving information from the Space Monitoring Center about the movement of space debris in orbit in the immediate vicinity of the ISS, Houston specialists immediately gave the command to turn on the engines of the Discovery spacecraft docked to the ISS. As a result, the stations' orbit was raised by four kilometers.

If the maneuver had not been possible, then the flying part could, in the event of a collision, damage, first of all, the solar panels of the station. The ISS hull cannot be penetrated by such a fragment: each of its modules is reliably covered with anti-meteor protection.

The International Space Station, ISS (English: International Space Station, ISS) is a manned multi-purpose space research complex.

Participating in the creation of the ISS are: Russia (Federal Space Agency, Roscosmos); USA (US National Aerospace Agency, NASA); Japan (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, JAXA), 18 European countries (European Space Agency, ESA); Canada (Canadian Space Agency, CSA), Brazil (Brazilian Space Agency, AEB).

Construction began in 1998.

The first module is "Zarya".

Completion of construction (presumably) - 2012.

The ISS completion date is (presumably) 2020.

The orbital altitude is 350-460 kilometers from the Earth.

Orbital inclination is 51.6 degrees.

The ISS makes 16 revolutions per day.

The weight of the station (at the time of completion of construction) is 400 tons (in 2009 - 300 tons).

Internal space (at the time of completion of construction) - 1.2 thousand cubic meters.

Length (along the main axis along which the main modules are lined up) is 44.5 meters.

Height - almost 27.5 meters.

Width (according to solar panels) - more than 73 meters.

The ISS was visited by the first space tourists (sent by Roscosmos together with the Space Adventures company).

In 2007, the flight of the first Malaysian astronaut, Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor, was organized.

The cost of building the ISS by 2009 amounted to $100 billion.

Flight Control:

the Russian segment is carried out from TsUP-M (TsUP-Moscow, Korolev, Russia);

American segment - from TsUP-X (TsUP-Houston, Houston, USA).

The operation of the laboratory modules included in the ISS is controlled by:

European "Columbus" - Control Center of the European Space Agency (Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany);

Japanese "Kibo" - Mission Control Center of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Tsukuba city, Japan).

The flight of the European automatic cargo ship ATV "Jules Verne" ("Jules Verne"), intended to supply the ISS, together with MCC-M and MCC-X, was controlled by the Center of the European Space Agency (Toulouse, France).

Technical coordination of work on the Russian segment of the ISS and its integration with the American segment is carried out by the Council of Chief Designers under the leadership of the President, General Designer of RSC Energia. S.P. Korolev, RAS academician Yu.P. Semenov.
Management of the preparation and launch of elements of the Russian segment of the ISS is carried out by the Interstate Commission for Flight Support and Operation of Orbital Manned Complexes.

According to the existing international agreement, each project participant owns its segments on the ISS.

The leading organization in creating the Russian segment and its integration with the American segment is RSC Energia named after. S.P. Queen, and for the American segment - the Boeing company.

About 200 organizations take part in the production of elements of the Russian segment, including: Russian Academy of Sciences; experimental mechanical engineering plant RSC Energia named after. S.P. Queen; rocket and space plant GKNPTs im. M.V. Khrunicheva; GNP RKTs "TSSKB-Progress"; Design Bureau of General Mechanical Engineering; RNII of Space Instrumentation; Research Institute of Precision Instruments; RGNII TsPK im. Yu.A. Gagarin.

Russian segment: service module "Zvezda"; functional cargo block "Zarya"; docking compartment "Pirce".

American segment: node module "Unity"; gateway module "Quest"; Laboratory module "Destiny"

Canada has created a manipulator for the ISS on the LAB module - the 17.6-meter robotic arm "Canadarm".

Italy supplies the ISS with so-called Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules (MPLM). By 2009, three of them had been made: “Leonardo”, “Raffaello”, “Donatello” (“Leonardo”, “Raffaello”, “Donatello”). These are large cylinders (6.4 x 4.6 meters) with a docking unit. The empty logistics module weighs 4.5 tons and can be loaded with up to 10 tons of experimental equipment and consumables.

Delivery of people to the station is provided by Russian Soyuz and American shuttles (reusable shuttles); cargo is delivered by Russian Progress aircraft and American shuttles.

Japan created its first scientific orbital laboratory, which became the largest module of the ISS - "Kibo" (translated from Japanese as "Hope", the international abbreviation is JEM, Japanese Experiment Module).

At the request of the European Space Agency, a consortium of European aerospace firms built the Columbus research module. It is designed for conducting physical, materials science, medical-biological and other experiments in the absence of gravity. At ESA's request, the "Harmony" module was made, which connects the Kibo and Columbus modules, and also provides their power supply and data exchange.

Additional modules and devices were also made on the ISS: a module of the root segment and gyrodynes on node-1 (Node 1); energy module (SB AS section) on Z1; mobile service system; device for moving equipment and crew; device "B" of the equipment and crew movement system; farms S0, S1, P1, P3/P4, P5, S3/S4, S5, S6.

All ISS laboratory modules have standardized racks for installing blocks with experimental equipment. Over time, the ISS will acquire new units and modules: the Russian segment should be replenished with a scientific and energy platform, a multipurpose research module Enterprise and a second functional cargo block (FGB-2). The “Cupola” node, built in Italy, will be mounted on the Node 3 module. This is a dome with a number of very large windows, through which the inhabitants of the station, like in a theater, will be able to observe the arrival of ships and monitor the work of their colleagues in outer space.

History of the creation of the ISS

Work on the International Space Station began in 1993.

Russia proposed that the United States join forces in implementing manned programs. By that time, Russia had a 25-year history of operating the Salyut and Mir orbital stations, and also had invaluable experience in conducting long-term flights, research, and a developed space infrastructure. But by 1991 the country found itself in dire economic straits. At the same time, the creators of the Freedom orbital station (USA) also experienced financial difficulties.

On March 15, 1993, General Director of the Roscosmos agency A Yu.N. Koptev and general designer of NPO Energia Yu.P. Semenov approached NASA head Goldin with a proposal to create an International Space Station.

On September 2, 1993, Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation Viktor Chernomyrdin and US Vice President Al Gore signed a “Joint Statement on Cooperation in Space,” which provided for the creation of a joint station. On November 1, 1993, a “Detailed Work Plan for the International Space Station” was signed, and in June 1994, a contract between NASA and Roscosmos agencies “On supplies and services for the Mir station and the International Space Station” was signed.

The initial stage of construction involves the creation of a functionally complete station structure from a limited number of modules. The first to be launched into orbit by the Proton-K launch vehicle was the Zarya functional cargo unit (1998), made in Russia. The second ship to deliver the shuttle was the American docking module Node-1, Unity, with the functional cargo block (December 1998). The third launched was the Russian service module "Zvezda" (2000), which provides station control, crew life support, station orientation and orbit correction. The fourth is the American laboratory module "Destiny" (2001).

The first prime crew of the ISS, which arrived at the station on November 2, 2000 on the Soyuz TM-31 spacecraft: William Shepherd (USA), ISS commander, flight engineer 2 of the Soyuz-TM-31 spacecraft; Sergey Krikalev (Russia), flight engineer of the Soyuz-TM-31 spacecraft; Yuri Gidzenko (Russia), ISS pilot, commander of the Soyuz TM-31 spacecraft.

The flight duration of the ISS-1 crew was about four months. His return to Earth was carried out by the American Space Shuttle, which delivered the crew of the second main expedition to the ISS. The Soyuz TM-31 spacecraft remained a part of the ISS for six months and served as a rescue ship for the crew working on board.

In 2001, the P6 energy module was installed on the Z1 root segment, the Destiny laboratory module, the Quest airlock chamber, the Pirs docking compartment, two telescopic cargo booms, and a remote manipulator were delivered into orbit. In 2002, the station was replenished with three truss structures (S0, S1, P6), two of which are equipped with transport devices for moving the remote manipulator and astronauts during work in outer space.

Construction of the ISS was suspended due to the disaster of the American spaceship Columbia on February 1, 2003, and construction work was resumed in 2006.

In 2001 and twice in 2007, computer failures were recorded in the Russian and American segments. In 2006, smoke occurred in the Russian segment of the station. In the fall of 2007, the station crew carried out repair work on the solar battery.

New sections of solar panels were delivered to the station. At the end of 2007, the ISS was replenished with two pressurized modules. In October, the Discovery shuttle STS-120 brought the node-2 Harmony connecting module into orbit, which became the main berth for the shuttles.

The European laboratory module Columbus was launched into orbit on the Atlantis ship STS-122 and, with the help of this ship's manipulator, was placed in its regular place (February 2008). Then the Japanese Kibo module was introduced into the ISS (June 2008), its first element was delivered to the ISS by the Endeavor shuttle STS-123 (March 2008).

Prospects for the ISS

According to some pessimistic experts, the ISS is a waste of time and money. They believe that the station has not yet been built, but is already outdated.

However, in implementing a long-term program of space flights to the Moon or Mars, humanity cannot do without the ISS.

From 2009, the permanent crew of the ISS will be increased to 9 people, and the number of experiments will increase. Russia has planned to conduct 331 experiments on the ISS in the coming years. The European Space Agency (ESA) and its partners have already built a new transport ship - the Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV), which will be launched into the base orbit (300 kilometers high) by the Ariane-5 ES ATV rocket, from where the ATV, using its engines, will go into orbit ISS (400 kilometers above the Earth). The payload of this automatic ship, 10.3 meters long and 4.5 meters in diameter, is 7.5 tons. This will include experimental equipment, food, air, and water for the ISS crew. The first of the ATV series (September 2008) was named "Jules Verne". After docking with the ISS in automatic mode, the ATV can work within its composition for six months, after which the ship is loaded with garbage and sank in a controlled manner in the Pacific Ocean. ATVs are planned to be launched once a year, and at least 7 of them will be built in total. The Japanese H-II "Transfer Vehicle" (HTV) automatic truck, launched into orbit by the Japanese H-IIB launch vehicle, which is currently still being developed, will join the ISS program . The total weight of the HTV will be 16.5 tons, of which 6 tons are payload for the station. It will be able to remain docked to the ISS for up to one month.

The outdated shuttles will be retired from flights in 2010, and the new generation will appear no earlier than 2014-2015.
By 2010, Russian manned Soyuz spacecraft will be modernized: first of all, electronic control and communication systems will be replaced, which will increase the spacecraft's payload by reducing the weight of electronic equipment. The updated Soyuz will be able to remain on the station for almost a year. The Russian side will build the Clipper spacecraft (according to the plan, the first test manned flight into orbit is 2014, commissioning is 2016). This six-seat reusable winged shuttle is conceived in two versions: with an aggregate compartment (ABO) or an engine compartment (DO). The Clipper, which has ascended into space into a relatively low orbit, will be followed by the interorbital tug Parom. "Ferry" is a new development designed to replace the cargo "Progress" over time. This tug must pull so-called “containers”, cargo “barrels” with a minimum of equipment (4-13 tons of cargo) from a low reference orbit to the ISS orbit, launched into space using Soyuz or Proton. The Parom has two docking ports: one for the container, the second for mooring to the ISS. After the container is launched into orbit, the ferry, using its propulsion system, descends to it, docks with it and lifts it to the ISS. And after unloading the container, Parom lowers it into a lower orbit, where it undocks and independently slows down to burn up in the atmosphere. The tug will have to wait for a new container to deliver it to the ISS.

Official website of RSC Energia: http://www.energia.ru/rus/iss/iss.html

Official website of the Boeing Corporation: http://www.boeing.com

Official website of the flight control center: http://www.mcc.rsa.ru

Official website of the US National Aerospace Agency (NASA): http://www.nasa.gov

Official website of the European Space Agency (ESA): http://www.esa.int/esaCP/index.html

Official website of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA): http://www.jaxa.jp/index_e.html

Official website of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA): http://www.space.gc.ca/index.html

Official website of the Brazilian Space Agency (AEB):

On November 2, 2000, its first long-term crew arrived at the station on the Russian Soyuz spacecraft. Three members of the first ISS expedition, having successfully launched on October 31, 2000 from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on the Soyuz TM-31 spacecraft, docked with the ISS service module Zvezda. After spending four and a half months aboard the ISS, the expedition members returned to Earth on March 21, 2001, on the American space shuttle Discovery STS-102. The crew performed tasks to assemble new station components, including connecting the American laboratory module Destiny to the orbital station. They also conducted various scientific experiments.
The first expedition took off from the same launch pad at the Baikonur Cosmodrome from which Yuri Gagarin took off 50 years ago to become the first person to fly into space. A three-stage, three-hundred-ton Soyuz-U launch vehicle lifted the Soyuz TM-31 spacecraft and crew into low-Earth orbit, approximately 10 minutes after launch, allowing Yuri Gidzenko to begin a series of rendezvous maneuvers with the ISS. On the morning of November 2, at about 9 hours 21 minutes UTC, the ship moored to the docking port of the Zvezda service module from the side of the orbital station. Ninety minutes after docking, Shepherd opened the Zvezda hatch and crew members entered the complex for the first time.

Their primary tasks were: launching a food heating device in the Zvezda galley, setting up sleeping quarters and establishing communication with both control centers: in Houston and Korolev near Moscow. The crew contacted both teams of ground specialists using Russian transmitters installed in the Zvezda and Zarya modules, and a microwave transmitter installed in the Unity module, which had previously been used for two years by American controllers to control the ISS and reading station system data when Russian ground stations were outside the reception area.

In their first weeks on board, crew members activated major life support systems and salvaged assorted station equipment, laptop computers, uniforms, office supplies, cables, and electrical equipment left for them by previous shuttle crews who had conducted a series of resupply missions to the new facility over the past two years.

During the expedition, docking of the station with the cargo ships Progress M1-4 (November 2000), Progress M-44 (February 2001) and the American shuttles Endeavor (December 2000), Atlantis (" Atlantis"; February 2001), Discovery ("Discovery"; March 2001).

The crew conducted research on 12 different experiments, including "Cardio-ODNT" (study of the functional capabilities of the human body in space flight), "Prognoz" (development of a method for operational forecasting of dose loads from cosmic radiation on the crew), "Uragan" (testing on the ground - space system for monitoring and forecasting the development of natural and man-made disasters), “Bend” (determination of the gravitational situation on the ISS, equipment operating conditions), “Plasma Crystal” (study of plasma-dust crystals and liquids in microgravity conditions), etc.

By setting up their new home, Gidzenko, Krikalev and Shepherd were setting the stage for Earthlings' long stay in space and extensive international scientific research for at least the next 15 years.